Pharmacogenetic Test System Classification Rules
Summary
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is classifying the pharmacogenetic assessment system into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for classification of the pharmacogenetic assessment system. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.
Compliance Requirements
- #1
Design verification and validation must include: (i) Data appropriate, as determined by FDA, to demonstrate the analytical accuracy and reliability of the device in intended use specimens, including precision, reproducibility, accuracy, limits of detection, and interferences. This information must include: (A) Data demonstrating appropriate, as determined by FDA, reproducibility for each genotype using each claimed sample type. Reproducibility data must be evaluated using specimens collected and processed in a manner consistent with the device's instructions for use, or, as determined by FDA, an appropriate alternative sample panel. (B) Analytical data demonstrating the limits of detection, including the minimum amount of input deoxy-ribonucleic acid (DNA) that will consistently produce accurate results. (C) Data demonstrating no clinically significant effects from endogenous and exogenous interferents relevant to each intended use specimen type. Interference data must also include an assessment of potentially interfering genetic sequences (e.g., variants proximal to the variant of interest, pseudogenes). (D) Validation data appropriate, as determined by FDA, to support specimen collection and handling claims. (E) Clinical data generated in intended use patient populations demonstrating the pharmacogenetic association between the genetic variant tested and any clinical claims or therapy-related recommendations associated with that genotype. (ii) Results from an appropriate, as determined by FDA, user comprehension study that demonstrate the intended user can use the device safely. The user comprehension study must be designed to include the following: (A) Study participants from a statistically sufficient sample size and a demographically diverse (e.g., age, education level) population that is representative of the intended use population and naive to use of the device, and (B) An evaluation of all result comprehension concepts that are critical for safe use of the device.; The labeling required under § 809.10 of this chapter must include: (i) Clear information, written in language appropriate for the intended user, that describes instructions for how test results should be interpreted. These instructions must be supported by valid scientific evidence and include: (A) Appropriate explanation of the claimed pharmacogenetic associations for all variants included in the test, any relevant variants not included in the test (e.g., that may contribute to false negative results), and specific considerations by ethnicity, and (B) Appropriate explanation of non-genetic and non-tested genetic factors that may impact interpretation of the test results; (ii) Detailed descriptions of analytical performance including, as applicable, precision, reproducibility, accuracy, limits of detection, and interferences as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, in language appropriate for the intended user; (iii) A warning statement that the patient should not use the test results to stop or change any medication, and that medications should always be taken as prescribed by a healthcare professional; (iv) A limiting statement explaining that this test is not intended to inform the patient about their current state of health, including whether the patient should or should not take a medication, or how much of a medication the patient should take, as appropriate; (v) A warning statement that the test does not diagnose any health conditions and is not a substitute for visits to a doctor or other healthcare professional; and (vi) A prominent and conspicuous limiting statement that the test provides only a preliminary test result that needs to be confirmed using an independent pharmacogenetic test without such a limitation prior to making any medical decisions. Alternatively, appropriate design verification and validation activities, including the generation of robust analytical data demonstrating appropriate analytical accuracy and reliability of test results for each genetic variant included in the test report, must be performed that demonstrate that the test can be used to make well-informed clinical decisions.; The test report must include an appropriate description of how the test results should be used by healthcare providers who may receive the test results from their patients, as applicable.; Publicly available pre-purchase labeling with unrestricted access that contains the following information must be provided: (i) A clear description of the test and its technology, the genotypes detected, and relevant clinical claims associated with each genotype; (ii) A clear description of what information the test will provide. This includes variant information, the limitations associated with the test, and any precautionary information about the test the user should be aware of before purchase; and (iii) A discussion of answers to frequently asked questions that is sufficient to provide intended users with an appropriate understanding of information specific to each pharmacogenetic association that is claimed.; The genetic test must use a sample collection device that is FDA-cleared or -approved, or classified as 510(k) exempt, with an indication for in vitro diagnostic use in DNA testing.; The intended use of the device must not include an indication for use in supporting or sustaining human life, being of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or presenting a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury.; This device is subject to premarket notification requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.; The device must comply with the special controls named in this final order to avoid automatic classification in class III.
Market Impacts
Classification of pharmacogenetic assessment systems into class II with special controls reduces regulatory burden by allowing 510(k) clearance instead of premarket approval, enhancing market access for similar devices; Device can serve as predicate for future substantially equivalent devices under section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act, enabling other sponsors to use 510(k) process instead of De Novo or PMA; Special controls impose specific requirements for device performance, labeling, and user comprehension that must be met for market access; Devices must comply with premarket notification requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act and cannot be marketed without proper clearance
Validated Company Impacts
Guardant Health, Inc.
Guardant Health operates as a precision oncology company developing and marketing FDA-approved medical diagnostic tests, including in vitro diagnostic devices like Guardant360 CDx, which directly aligns with the pharmacogenetic assessment system classification. The company's focus on genomic profiling, liquid biopsy testing, and compliance with FDA regulatory requirements demonstrates strong operational alignment with this rule's scope for medical device manufacturers. The rule focuses on regulatory requirements for pharmacogenetic assessment system manufacturers, including device classification, labeling, and performance standards. The company's only regulatory risk mentions general 'regulatory approval uncertainties' without specifying medical devices or genetic testing, indicating minimal direct alignment with this specific FDA rule.
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
Merit Medical Systems primarily manufactures interventional medical devices such as catheters, guidewires, and embolization products, with no evidence of pharmacogenetic assessment systems or molecular diagnostics in their business operations. The company focuses on cardiovascular, radiology, and endoscopy markets rather than genetic testing or pharmacogenetic devices. The company's FDA regulatory clearance risk directly aligns with this rule's requirements for pharmacogenetic assessment systems, as the rule imposes specific premarket notification and special controls compliance that could cause delays or failure in product commercialization. The foreign regulatory approvals risk also shows partial alignment, as similar compliance requirements may apply in international markets where the company operates.