Oregon Air Quality Plan Updates

|2025-14971|1098 days overdue
View on Federal Register

Summary

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is updating the materials that are incorporated by reference (IBR) into the Oregon State Implementation Plan (SIP). The regulations affected by this update have been previously submitted by Oregon and approved by the EPA. In this final rule, the EPA is also notifying the public of corrections and clarifying changes in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) tables that identify the materials incorporated by reference into the Oregon SIP. This update affects the materials that are available for public inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the EPA Regional Office.

Compliance Requirements

  1. #1

    OAR 340-200-0020 General Air Quality Definitions (defining terms used in the Oregon air quality regulations), State effective March 1, 2023; OAR 340-200-0025 Abbreviations and Acronyms (defining abbreviations and acronyms used in the Oregon air quality regulations), State effective March 1, 2023; OAR 340-200-0035 Reference Materials (specifying the title and version of each reference material used in the Oregon air quality regulations), State effective March 1, 2023; OAR 340-204-0300 Designation of Sustainment Areas (identifying the areas in Oregon designated as sustaining the relevant air quality standard), State effective March 1, 2023; OAR 340-204-0310 Designation of Reattainment Areas (identifying the areas in Oregon designated as reattaining the relevant air quality standard), State effective March 1, 2023; OAR 340-206-0010 Introduction (establishing significant harm levels for pollutants in areas based on priority level), State effective March 1, 2023; OAR 340-208-0110 Visible Air Contaminant Limitations (establishing limits and test methods for visible emissions), State effective March 1, 2023; OAR 340-209-0080 Issuance or Denial of a Permit (specifying procedures for issuing and denying permits, including how to request a hearing to contest a permit decision), State effective March 1, 2023; OAR 340-210-0100 Registration in General (identifying categories of sources that are required to register with the Oregon DEQ), State effective March 1, 2023; OAR 340-210-0205 Notice of Construction and Approval of Plans: Applicability and Requirements, except paragraph (3) (listing source types and activities that require notice to the Oregon DEQ prior to construction), State effective March 1, 2023

    Deadline: 2023-03-01(March 1, 2023)

Market Impacts

  • Update to materials incorporated by reference into the Oregon State Implementation Plan (SIP) affecting air quality regulations and emissions control requirements.; New and updated regulations may create opportunities for environmental technology providers and consulting services to assist businesses in compliance.; Specific regulatory provisions may impose restrictions on industrial manufacturing and energy production processes to meet air quality standards.

Validated Company Impacts

CMIScore: 100%

CUMMINS INC

Cummins Inc. manufactures diesel and natural gas engines and power generation systems that produce visible emissions and pollutants, directly aligning with Oregon's air quality regulations governing emissions limits, permit requirements, and registration for industrial sources. The company's manufacturing operations and energy production activities fall squarely under the rule's jurisdiction for entities emitting pollutants and requiring air quality permits. The federal rule focuses exclusively on air quality regulations and emissions control requirements in Oregon, which has no alignment with the company's sole identified risk of cybersecurity threats. There is no overlap between environmental compliance obligations and technology security vulnerabilities in the company's risk profile.

CVXScore: 100%

CHEVRON CORP

Chevron's oil and gas production and refining operations directly involve industrial processes that emit air contaminants and pollutants, making them subject to Oregon's air quality regulations updated by this rule. The company operates facilities that would require permits, registration, and compliance with visible emission limits and construction notifications under these regulations. The rule focuses on air quality regulations and emissions control in Oregon, which does not align with the company's primary risk factors related to reservoir performance, production costs, price volatility, and development complexity. The company has only one generic regulatory compliance risk identified, but it shows no specific connection to environmental or air quality regulations.

DOWScore: 100%

DOW INC.

Dow Inc. operates significant chemical manufacturing facilities in Oregon that emit air pollutants, making them directly subject to Oregon's air quality regulations updated by this rule. Their industrial operations require permits, emissions monitoring, and compliance with visible contaminant limitations, directly aligning with multiple regulatory provisions. The rule focuses on Oregon-specific air quality regulations and emissions control requirements, which does not align with the company's disclosed risk factors related to cybersecurity, data privacy, and technology competition. The company operates in digital services and technology sectors without any mention of industrial operations, manufacturing, or environmental compliance risks in Oregon.

FEScore: 100%

FIRSTENERGY CORP

FirstEnergy's electricity generation operations, particularly any fossil fuel-based power plants in Oregon, would be directly subject to Oregon's air quality regulations updated by this rule, including emissions limits, permit requirements, and registration obligations for sources. The federal rule focuses on Oregon-specific air quality regulation updates and definitions, while the company's disclosed risks center on CCR regulations, asset retirement obligations, and Pennsylvania-specific environmental liabilities with no mention of Oregon operations or air quality compliance. The company has regulatory and environmental risk categories, but they do not align with the geographic or substantive scope of this air quality rule.

IMOScore: 100%

IMPERIAL OIL LTD

Imperial Oil operates primarily in Canada with oil and gas exploration, production, and refining activities, while this EPA rule specifically updates incorporated reference materials for Oregon's State Implementation Plan affecting only entities subject to Oregon air quality regulations. There is minimal alignment as the company's Canadian operations fall outside this Oregon-specific jurisdiction, though its oil and gas activities could theoretically be subject to similar air quality regulations if operating in Oregon. The rule directly impacts the company's regulatory risk category, specifically addressing carbon policy and climate regulations which is identified as a top risk affecting their Downstream business. The air quality regulations and emissions control requirements align with the company's operational risks in refining and industrial processes.

OCScore: 100%

Owens Corning

Owens Corning's environmental control and remediation business directly aligns with the Oregon air quality regulations updated by this rule, as their operations involve compliance with environmental laws and likely include air quality management. The company's focus on environmental remediation positions them to assist clients affected by these regulatory changes, creating business opportunities in consulting and compliance services. The rule focuses on Oregon-specific air quality regulatory updates, which does not align with the company's disclosed regulatory risk of general compliance costs and operational restrictions. The company's regulatory risk is broad and not specific to environmental or geographic factors, while this rule is narrowly targeted to air quality in Oregon.

SOScore: 100%

SOUTHERN CO

Southern Company operates electric utilities and power generation assets that emit air pollutants, making them subject to Oregon air quality regulations including permit requirements, visible emission limits, and registration obligations. The company's energy production and industrial operations directly align with the rule's focus on entities emitting pollutants and requiring air quality permits. The rule's focus on Oregon-specific air quality regulations and emissions control has minimal alignment with the company's generic 'Environmental Regulations' risk factor, which lacks geographic or operational specificity. The company's risk profile does not indicate Oregon operations or air emissions concerns, suggesting only indirect potential impact.

STLDScore: 100%

STEEL DYNAMICS INC

Steel Dynamics operates steel production facilities using electric arc furnaces and metals recycling operations that generate significant air emissions, directly subjecting them to Oregon's air quality regulations including visible emissions limits, permit requirements, and registration obligations for industrial sources. The federal rule focuses on air quality compliance requirements in Oregon, which does not align with any of the company's disclosed risk factors related to cost volatility, import pressure, pricing fluctuations, interest rates, or technology dependence. The company's risk profile shows no environmental regulatory compliance risks, indicating minimal relevance to this specific air quality rule.

TLNScore: 100%

Talen Energy Corp

Talen Energy operates power generation facilities that are subject to air quality regulations and emission requirements, directly aligning with the Oregon air quality regulations updated by this rule. The company's operations involve emissions that would fall under visible air contaminant limitations, permit requirements, and registration obligations specified in the rule. The rule focuses on air quality compliance and emissions regulations in Oregon, which does not align with the company's primary risk factors related to weather events, PJM capacity penalties, electricity sales volatility, and hedging losses. The company has minimal regulatory compliance risks identified (only 2 out of 17 total risks), and none specifically mention air quality or environmental regulations.

CBTScore: 100%

CABOT CORP

Cabot Corp manufactures carbon black, a chemical production process that generates significant air emissions including visible contaminants and pollutants subject to Oregon's air quality regulations. The company's industrial manufacturing operations directly align with multiple compliance requirements including visible emission limitations, permit applications, and registration requirements for specific source categories. The federal rule focuses exclusively on air quality regulations and emissions control requirements in Oregon, which involves operational risks related to environmental compliance, permitting, and emissions monitoring. The company's only disclosed risk factor relates to information technology systems failures, with no mention of environmental, regulatory, or air quality compliance risks in its risk profile.

CCScore: 100%

Chemours Co

Chemours operates multiple chemical manufacturing segments that produce refrigerants, TiO2 pigment, polymers, and specialty chemicals - all industrial processes that generate air emissions and would be subject to Oregon's air quality regulations including permit requirements, visible emission limits, and registration obligations for specific source categories. The rule focuses on air quality compliance and emissions control in Oregon, which does not align with the company's disclosed risk profile that emphasizes financial, operational, and market competition risks. The single regulatory compliance risk mentioned is likely related to litigation rather than environmental regulations, showing minimal relevance.

WECScore: 100%

WEC ENERGY GROUP, INC.

WEC Energy Group operates electric utility generation facilities that emit air pollutants and would be subject to Oregon's air quality regulations if operating in that state. The company's energy production activities directly align with the rule's focus on emissions control, permit requirements, and registration for industrial sources. The rule focuses on Oregon-specific air quality regulatory updates, which does not align with the company's disclosed financial and regulatory risks such as accounting uncertainties, goodwill impairment, pension costs, and rate case outcomes. The company's regulatory risks appear focused on cost recovery and earnings rather than environmental compliance, showing minimal relevance.

WMScore: 100%

WASTE MANAGEMENT INC

Waste Management operates landfill operations and waste disposal facilities that generate visible emissions and pollutants subject to Oregon air quality regulations, including landfill gas operations that would require registration, permits, and compliance with emissions limits. The company's industrial waste collection and disposal activities directly align with entities affected by Oregon's air quality regulations for emissions control and permit requirements. The rule focuses on Oregon-specific air quality regulations and emissions control requirements, while the company's disclosed risks center on renewable fuel markets (RINs volatility, RFS program changes), interest rates, and recycling commodity prices. There is minimal overlap as the company's regulatory compliance risks appear focused on federal renewable fuel standards rather than state-level air quality permitting and emissions regulations.

CENXScore: 100%

CENTURY ALUMINUM CO

Century Aluminum operates multiple aluminum production facilities, which are industrial manufacturing operations that typically generate significant air emissions including visible contaminants and require air quality permits. The company's operations in Oregon would be directly subject to these updated Oregon air quality regulations incorporated by reference into the SIP. The rule focuses on Oregon-specific air quality regulatory updates, while the company's single regulatory compliance risk is generic litigation without specific environmental or air quality focus. The company's primary risks are financial and operational (hurricanes), showing minimal overlap with air quality regulation impacts.

NUEScore: 100%

NUCOR CORP

Nucor operates steel mills and manufacturing facilities that emit air contaminants and require air quality permits in Oregon, directly aligning with the rule's focus on entities subject to Oregon air quality regulations, visible emissions limitations, and permit requirements. The rule focuses on air quality compliance and environmental regulatory impacts, which do not align with the company's disclosed risk factors of commodity price volatility, interest rate exposure, and foreign currency fluctuations. There is no overlap between the rule's environmental compliance requirements and the company's identified financial, operational, and market competition risks.

PBFScore: 100%

PBF Energy Inc.

PBF Energy operates petroleum refineries and energy production facilities that emit air contaminants and require air quality permits in Oregon, directly aligning with the rule's focus on entities subject to Oregon air quality regulations, emissions limitations, and permit requirements. The rule focuses specifically on Oregon air quality regulation updates, which is a narrow geographic and regulatory scope that does not align with the company's broad regulatory compliance risks related to crude oil operations and international shipping disruptions. The company's identified regulatory risks appear to be more focused on broader environmental policy changes and operational disruptions rather than state-specific air quality definition updates.

PORScore: 100%

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO /OR/

Portland General Electric operates energy generation facilities in Oregon that emit air pollutants, making them subject to Oregon's air quality regulations updated by this rule. The company's power generation activities would require compliance with visible emissions limits, permit applications, and registration requirements specified in the rule. The federal rule focuses on air quality regulatory compliance in Oregon, which does not align with any of the company's disclosed risk factors. The company's risks are primarily financial (capital expenditures, debt, inflation) and operational (infrastructure upgrades, economic conditions) with no mention of environmental compliance or regulatory air quality concerns.

RSGScore: 100%

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.

Republic Services operates landfills and renewable energy projects that generate visible emissions and pollutants, directly subjecting them to Oregon's air quality regulations including visible emission limitations and permit requirements. Their landfill gas-to-energy operations specifically involve emissions that fall under the rule's jurisdiction for entities emitting pollutants in priority areas. The rule focuses on air quality compliance and emissions regulations in Oregon, which does not align with the company's disclosed risk factors of interest rate volatility, pension withdrawal liability, labor costs, commodity price volatility, and tax provision adjustments. The company's single regulatory compliance risk appears unrelated to environmental air quality requirements.

AAScore: 100%

Alcoa Corp

Alcoa Corp operates aluminum smelting facilities that are major sources of air emissions, including particulate matter and greenhouse gases, making them directly subject to Oregon air quality regulations. The company's manufacturing operations require air permits, emissions monitoring, and compliance with visible emission limits, all of which are affected by this rule update to Oregon's State Implementation Plan. The rule's focus on air quality regulations and emissions control aligns with the company's identified environmental regulations risk, which includes compliance costs and operational restrictions. However, this represents only one of five major risk factors, and the Oregon-specific geographic scope limits broader applicability to the company's overall risk profile.

AVAScore: 100%

AVISTA CORP

Avista Corp operates electric and natural gas utility services in the Pacific Northwest, including Oregon, which directly falls under the Oregon air quality regulations updated by this rule. Their energy production and distribution activities involve emissions that would be subject to the permit requirements, registration obligations, and visible emission limitations specified in the Oregon SIP. The rule focuses on Oregon-specific air quality regulatory updates, which does not directly align with the company's disclosed utility regulatory, operational, or climate change risks. The company's regulatory risk appears focused on rate policies rather than environmental compliance, and there is no mention of air quality or emissions-related concerns in its risk profile.

EDScore: 100%

CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC

Con Edison operates energy production and utility services that involve emissions from power generation and distribution infrastructure, directly subject to Oregon air quality regulations. The company's operations in energy production and potential construction/modification activities align with multiple compliance requirements including visible emissions limits, permit applications, and registration requirements. The rule focuses on Oregon-specific air quality regulatory updates affecting emissions control and industrial operations, while the company's risk factors center on cybersecurity, data privacy, and financial compliance with no mention of environmental regulations or air quality concerns. There is minimal overlap as the company operates in technology services rather than industrial sectors that would be directly impacted by air quality rules.

ETScore: 100%

Energy Transfer LP

Energy Transfer LP operates extensive pipeline and processing facilities that emit air contaminants and require environmental permits in Oregon, directly aligning with the rule's focus on air quality regulations, visible emissions limits, and permit requirements for industrial operations. The rule focuses on Oregon-specific air quality regulations and emissions control requirements, which do not align with the company's disclosed risk factors related to cybersecurity, data privacy, and technology competition. The company operates in digital services and technology sectors without any mention of industrial operations, manufacturing, or environmental compliance risks in Oregon.

BCCScore: 100%

BOISE CASCADE Co

Boise Cascade operates lumber mills, plywood plants, and engineered wood product facilities in Oregon that emit air pollutants and require air quality permits, directly aligning with Oregon's air quality regulations updated by this rule. The company's manufacturing operations involve visible emissions and pollutant discharge that fall under the specific regulatory provisions for permit requirements, emissions limitations, and registration. The federal rule focuses exclusively on environmental compliance and air quality regulations in Oregon, while the company's disclosed risk factors are purely financial (interest rate and foreign currency risks). There is no overlap between the rule's environmental regulatory impacts and the company's financial risk profile.