Security Clearance and Sensitive Position Eligibility Procedures

|2024-16136|No deadline
View on Federal Register

Summary

The Department of Energy (DOE) publishes a final rule to amend its regulations, which set forth the policies and procedures for resolving questions concerning eligibility for DOE access authorizations. The final rule expands the scope of the rule to include individuals applying for or in positions requiring eligibility to hold a sensitive position; updates and adds clarity, including by deleting obsolete references throughout the rule for consistency with national policies and DOE practices; and updates references to DOE officials and offices.

Compliance Requirements

  1. #1

    The procedures outlined in this part apply to determinations of eligibility for access authorization or eligibility to hold a sensitive position for: (1) Employees (including consultants) of, and applicants for employment with, contractors and agents of the DOE; (2) Access permittees of the DOE and their employees (including consultants) and applicants for employment; (3) Employees (including consultants) of, and applicants for employment with, the DOE; and (4) Other persons designated by the Secretary of Energy.; To the extent the procedures in this part apply to determinations of eligibility for access to classified information or special nuclear material, they shall also apply to determinations of eligibility to hold a sensitive position, except as specifically noted.; The Secretary has established procedures that will afford those individuals described in § 710.2 the opportunity for administrative review of questions concerning their eligibility for access authorization or eligibility to hold a sensitive position.; None of the procedures established for determining eligibility for access authorization or eligibility to hold a sensitive position shall be used for an improper purpose, including any attempt to coerce, restrain, threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against individuals for exercising their rights under any statute, regulation or DOE directive.; Continuous vetting means reviewing the background of an individual described in § 710.2(a)(1) through (4) at any time to determine whether that individual continues to meet applicable requirements for access authorization or a sensitive position.; Sensitive position means any position within or in support of a Federal department or agency, the occupant of which could bring about, by virtue of the nature of the position, a material adverse effect on national security regardless of whether the occupant has access to classified information and regardless of whether the occupant is an employee, military service member, or contractor.; The Manager must provide a copy of SEAD 4 or successor directive as part of the notification letter to ensure that an individual going through administrative review under this part will receive a copy of the applicable adjudicative standards.; The 30 days provided to the individual for requesting review of the Manager's initial decision is subject to any extensions granted by the Director under paragraph (c)(3).; Conferences may be conducted by telephone, video teleconference, or other means as directed by the Administrative Judge.

Market Impacts

  • Expansion of scope to include individuals in sensitive positions regardless of classified information access requirement creates new compliance barriers for contractors and service providers working with DOE; Mandatory implementation of continuous vetting requirements replacing periodic reinvestigations, requiring ongoing monitoring rather than periodic checks; New market opportunity created by the shift from periodic reinvestigations to continuous vetting under Trusted Workforce 2.0 initiative; Expanded coverage to include contractor employees for appeal rights under SEAD 9, increasing compliance requirements for all contractors working with DOE

Validated Company Impacts

CACIScore: 100%

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/

CACI operates extensively as a government contractor providing technology and expertise to federal agencies, including likely DOE contracts, which directly falls under the rule's scope for DOE contractors and their employees requiring access authorizations. The company's focus on national security technology solutions and government consulting aligns with the sensitive positions and continuous vetting requirements. The rule focuses on security clearance and personnel vetting requirements for DOE contractors and sensitive positions, which does not align with the company's disclosed risk factors. The company's primary risks are financial constraints, economic conditions, and cybersecurity threats, with only one generic regulatory compliance risk mentioned without specific details about government contracting or security clearances.

LDOSScore: 100%

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Leidos operates extensively as a defense contractor providing advanced technology solutions to defense and intelligence communities, directly falling under DOE contractor classification requiring access authorization compliance. The company's government contracting business model and work with classified systems align perfectly with the rule's expanded scope covering contractor employees in sensitive positions requiring continuous vetting. The rule focuses on security clearance and personnel vetting procedures for DOE contractors and sensitive positions, which does not directly align with the company's disclosed risk factors of contract cancellations, cybersecurity threats, debt levels, budget cuts, or goodwill impairment. There is minimal overlap as the company mentions only one regulatory compliance risk generally, but no specific details about security clearance requirements or DOE contracting.

PSNScore: 100%

PARSONS CORP

Parsons Corp is a major government contractor providing critical infrastructure, cybersecurity, and national security services to federal agencies including the Department of Energy, placing them directly within the scope of this rule's requirements for contractor employees requiring access authorizations and sensitive positions. The rule's expansion of security clearance and continuous vetting requirements directly aligns with the company's identified operational risks related to compliance with procurement rules and reputation with the U.S. federal government. As a government contractor, failure to meet these enhanced DOE security requirements could result in contract termination and disqualification from future contracts, which are explicitly cited in the company's risk factors.

SAICScore: 100%

Science Applications International Corp

SAIC operates primarily as a U.S. government contractor with significant defense and intelligence sector work, placing its employees in positions requiring security clearances and access to classified materials that fall directly under DOE's expanded scope for access authorization and sensitive position eligibility determinations. The rule's focus on security clearance procedures for DOE contractors and sensitive positions has minimal direct alignment with the company's disclosed risk factors. While the company has regulatory compliance risks and dependence on government contracts, the specific DOE security clearance requirements do not directly address their identified risks of contract performance fluctuations, revenue volatility, cybersecurity threats, or competitive pressures.